# Relayers are structurally safer than bridges

- **Speaker:** Unknown
- **Attribution:** uncertain
- **Said:** 2022-08-14
- **Theme:** Crypto &amp; DePIN — https://www.gregosuri.com/predictions/crypto-depin/
- **Source:** IBC Relayers are safer than Bridges - Here's Why (Akash Network)
- **Watch at:** 00:00:00 — https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FSpBsstdbMA&t=0s
- **Canonical:** https://www.gregosuri.com/predictions/crypto-depin/2022-08-14-relayers-are-structurally-safer-than-bridges-lq6b/
- **Cite as:** Unknown, "Relayers are structurally safer than bridges," IBC Relayers are safer than Bridges - Here's Why (Akash Network), 14 Aug 2022, 00:00:00. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FSpBsstdbMA&t=0s

## Quote — verbatim

> The assets are not actually secured by the bridge, but rather the bridge or the relayer just puts packets across. It doesn't secure any of the assets — the security of the asset depends on the security of the blockchain that either sends the asset or receives the asset.

## Context — site annotation, not spoken

Post-bridge-hack era argument for Cosmos IBC's design. **Speaker:** uncredited clip; voice/style consistent with Greg but not introduced.
